(00:30) Jon asks Rob about his presentation at NDC London. Rob’s talk started by describing how he got fired from a job by trying to do something that was NP-Hard. This past year he dug into understand complexity theory, mostly from the point of view of just recognizing the pitfalls. He once wrote a co-occurrence query for just two products (two products that are bought together frequently), and that worked just fine. However, trying to write a co-occurrence query for three or four products doesn’t work because it’s exponentially hard.
(02:23) Jon asks about the different classes of problems. Rob explains the terms, starting with polynomial time (P) problems, then talking about exponential and factorial complexity.
(04:10) Jon talks about how Rob’s co-occurrence query was exponentially hard, but for just two products it worked fine. Rob continues with his example from his talk about finding the best place for a group of people to go – that’s NP-Hard. But if there are only two people, you can handle it. You can get into solving some harder problems using concurrency and throwing machines at the problem, but you should understand it.
(5:10) Rob explains how ideas like page rank fit in, by using authority as a heuristic. Heuristics can be use used for other problems, like the travelling salesman – they won’t give you the provably best solution, but they will reliably give you a very good answer.
(7:45) Jon asks about the difference between decisions and optimizations. Rob explains that decision problems are NP-Complete problems – if you can represent a problem as a long boolean statement, it’s a boolean satisfiability problem. He describes how optimization problems
(10:12) Jon asks about Rob’s recent book, The Impostor’s Handbook. Rob explains why he wrote it, and the current audio / video updates he’s making for it.
(11:40) Jon mentions how there’s a lot more to the book than complexity theory, and Rob explains how it’s all related – complexity theory, foundations of computing, lambda calculus, etc. Jon asks Rob why he likes lambda calculus so much, and Rob talks about a presentation he really liked by Jim Weirich in which he built a y combinator, and he talks about some examples from his book using a y combinator in ES6 to do things like fibbonaci series.
(14:00) Rob’s book, The Impostor’s Handbook, is available at bigmachine.io.
(02:00) Jon comments on the star power among the contributors to HT. Richard calls out Shawn Wildermuth’s contributions and how he’s been applying his version update experience from his coursework to the project. HT got its start as the example project for the Visual Studio 2015 launch.
(04:04) Jon remembers to ask Richard to explain what HT is: open source software for disaster relief organizations. Richard was motivated by the realization that it’s hard for software developers to donate their skills to charity because software comes with an ongoing maintenance cost.
(05:35) Scott asks for a description of what the software does. Richard says Humanitarian Toolbox is a collection of projects, and they’re initially focused on the allReady project. allReady started to help the Red Cross organize and coordinate smoke detector installation efforts to prevent home fire disasters. Software can help through things like mapping, mobile apps, and Twilio based notifications. Just the simple addition of reminder notifications before going out to install smoke detectors has raised their install rate from about 30% to about 80%.
(09:00) AllReady is an ASP.NET Core web application using some default Bootstrap theming, and could definitely use some designer help. They work with the Red Cross to provide domain expertise. They’ve had some field trials, but are just now rolling it out broadly to the field now.
(11:35) Scott says that it sounds like HT is a little different from the drive by pull request model that’s common in the open source world. Richard says that pull requests really should start as an issue and a discussion before the pull request. They’ve consciously grouped issues so they can be managed at hackathons as well as milestones for releases.
(13:12) Jon notes that many open source projects evolve a pull request at a time and often don’t have a clear high level architecture. Richard says they’ve put some effort into architecture and hosting, with the realization that they’ll probably be hosting and maintaining the applications. He says that it’s great to be able to work directly with folks like Dominick Baier for IdentityServer, Jon Skeet for NodaTime, etc.
(14:55) Scott asks about a point Richard had made in his keynote about all the IoT devices we’ve got, but not enough software to go around. Richard says he doesn’t want the disaster relief heroes spending money on software. They don’t understand the impact mobile and cloud can have on their work, and we can help them. He talks about the possibilities for crisis check-in and citizen disaster evaluation using things like social media for things like bridge damage evaluation. There’s so much to be done, the job requires prioritization and building things in a sustainable way.
(18:32) Scott asks about how people can get involved; Richard points to htbox.org.
(19:12) Jon doubles back to the interaction pattern Richard talked about earlier with issues leading to discussion, then pull requests. Richard also refers to the weekly hangouts, where discussion and collaboration also happen.
(20:39) Scott asks what kind of help they could use. Richard says they’ve got a lot of people working on the ASP.NET Core side of things, but need more mobile development help.
Gadgets and Idle Chatter
(22:00) Scott asks Richard what his latest gadgets are. Richard talks about his new Dell 43 inch 4K monitor.
(23:30) Jon asks about Richard’s office remodel project, including LED lighting.
(25:30) Scott asks Richard what he’s doing when he’s not working. Aside from running a charity, he likes to get off the grid an hike in the Himalayas.
Jon and Kevin talk to Gary Ewan Park and Mattias Karlsson about Cake, a cross platform build automation system with a C# DSL to do things like compiling code, copy files/folders, running unit tests, compress files and build NuGet packages.
(01:48) Jon asks about the integrations and CI support. Gary says that’s a key feature: the build you run on your development machine is going to be as close as possible, if not identical to, the build you’re going to run on your CI server. Right now, Cake is set up with at least 10 online CI servers, which has the added benefit of providing them with a ton of badges for their GitHub readme.
(03:15) Jon says that he cloned the getting started repo and ran a script and some magic happened… but what exactly was that magic doing? Mattias explains that the bootstrapper (either build.ps1 or build.sh) fetches Cake from NuGet, then it launches the build.cake file.
(04:07) Jon asks if PowerShell on Linux will have an impact on Cake, or if the build.sh is simple enough that they’ll just stay with that. Gary says that the bootstrappers are very lightweight and normally don’t need to be changed (although you can if you want), so there’s no real advantage to moving to PowerShell since people who are building on Mac and Linux will probably prefer to just run a shell script.
(05:17) Kevin flips it around and asks if it matters for Bash on Windows. Gary says they’ve got this one covered, too, as they’ve already tested out Cake on Bash on Windows. Mattias says the hard part is the platform specific dependencies, and Gary agrees, saying that Cake is just a wrapper around the tools – there’s an expectation that the tools are either installed or available as a NuGet package.
(06:55) Jon asks if tools are well segmented per-project. Mattias confirms that everything is project specific – you can share if you want, but the default is that you can just clone a repository and build without thinking about dependencies.
(07:50) Jon asks how Cake works with Docker. Mattias talks about the preconfigured Docker images for Cake, which make it easy to easily test builds, handle integration tests, etc. He’s currently testing against Nano Server. Nano Server is very stripped down requires you to install a lot of prerequisites for Cake, so it’s nice to have a preconfigured Docker image for testing. Mattias talks about how versioning with tagged containers help them with integration testing. Gary talk about how they’re using Docker with Bitbucket Pipelines to really speed up their Travis build tests.
(10:25) Jon asks what a Cake script is – is it just C# code? Gary describes some of the additional build DSL features they’ve added, but other than that it’s just standard C# code.
(13:30) Jon said that he opened the Cake file in Visual Studio code and saw there was an extension for syntax highlighting, and asks if there’s additional tools for IntelliSense. Gary talks about the current status of OmniSharp when running against Cake. Note that since this podcast was recorded, this has improved as explained in this blog post: How to debug a Cake file using Visual Studio Code.
(15:28) Jon asks about debugging a Cake script. Mattias says they’ve added a debug switch to the Cake exe, which waits for you to attach so you can debug. Jon says it sounds great to have debugging support for a build script. Mattias says it’s nice, but since your build scripts are often running on build server it’s also important to have good logging support.
(17:02) Jon asks what the logging support is. Mattias says there’s a built-in abstraction for logging as well as an exception handler, so to break the build you can just throw an exception. Gary say that the default is just to log to the build server like AppVeyor, but if you want to log to something like logstash you can. Mattias says that they log to standard output and standard error, and every build system integrates well with that.
.NET Core support, DI and Modules, Cross-platform Support
(18:06) Jon asks more about the .NET Core port. Mattias says they’re just about done, just working with integration tests. For the most part it’s pretty straightforward, but you can run into things like differences between kernel versions on Linux. The biggest issue has been waiting for dependencies to be available on .NET Core. In the past they’ve relied on Mono for Linux and Mac, and there are slight differences compared to the .NET Framework, so it will be good to be on Core CLR everywhere. (note: the port to .NET Core has since been completed).
(19:52) Jon says he notices they’re using Autofac. Mattias says they use it for dependency injection throughout the codebase, but they’ve replaced it in some places for things like their module system.
(20:33) Jon asks how the module system works. Mattias says you just add a module folder in your tools and implement some attributes on your interfaces that indicate what your module should replace. (22:17) Jon asks about any issues they ran into with the .NET Core cross-platform port. Mattias says there are a lot of dependencies you don’t think about – for instance nuget.exe isn’t available cross-platform or on Nano Server, since it only has the Core CLR. Gary says they made a conscious decision not to implement .NET Core early, so they avoided some of the early adopter pain that some other projects ran into.
(23:47) Jon asks if they’re doing anything specific to handle platform differences. Mattias says that there are a few IFDEFs, but for the most part issues are around tools support, in which case it just won’t launch at all. Gary talks about platform specific criteria you can use in your build scripts to make platform specific decisions.
Cake Tasks, Parallel Tasks, Build System Integration, Unit Tests
(26:36) Jon asks how task names are used in a script. Mattias says that those labels are used to determine task dependencies. Gary says you can also use the labels as entry points which are specific to the build server.
(28:22) Jon asks if tasks are run in parallel. Mattias says it’s not currently multithreaded because logs would be difficult to follow. When you define a task, it’s just added to the graph, and nothing’s actually executed until you call RunTarget. Gary said there is an open issue to allow parallel execution of tasks, but they’re still working on a good story around debugging and logging. Mattias says it’s standard C# so there’s noting stopping you from running async tasks using the standard C# async methods.
(31:46) Jon says he sees support for several build systems and asks about how you integrate with them. Mattias explains how CI systems can call commandline options, and Gary says that all build systems have provisions for environment variables, and Cake provides a typed wrapper around that, so you get a strongly typed object from the build-specific provider to make informed decisions. For instance, when running on AppVeyor their script pushes the NuGet packages to the prerelease MyGet feed from the development branch and the official NuGet feed when running on release.
(34:09) Jon asks about assembly info patching and versions. Cake can update based on version info. It’s got file hash support, which is important for pushing to Homebrew.
(34:55) Jon asks about unit test integration. Gary says they have method aliases for calling common unit test frameworks, and you can easily extend for other frameworks. Unit test harnesses have published return values, so you can make informed decisions based on specific unit test results.
Publishing, Installers, Release Notes
(36:46) Jon asks about publishing options. Cake can build the nuspec for you, you can use your own if you want, or on Core CLR you can use dotnet pack. Jon asks about some of the different ways NuGet is used as a deployment package. (38:42) Jon asks about other installers like WiX, NSIS, etc. Gary says that Cake is really just wrapping tools with strongly typed classes, which makes it easier to pass in property values to tools. There’s no real magic, it’s just bringing it up an abstraction layer, so you don’t have to remember the command semantics of each tool. Jon asks if, in addition to simplifying how you interact with tools, the abstraction makes it a little easier to switch between tools. Gary says that’s true, and describes how this works in practice.
(41:44) Jon asks about the release note parsing feature. Gary says there’s an included release notes parser, which can extract version numbers and bulleted release features from a markdown file assuming it’s in a known format. This allows you to stamp your assembly with the version number, and use the bulleted release notes in your NuGet or Chocolatey release notes. There are also Git Release Notes and Git Release Manager which can be used to generate release notes from issues in a milestone based release on GitHub. Gary says they use this with Cake releases, so just tagging a release gives them an end to end publish process which sets version numbers and writes release notes for all their release endpoints (NuGet, Chocolatey, GitHub release, etc.).
(44:54) Jon asks about the social network support. Gary and Mattias explain how the different addins can announce builds to Twitter, Slack, Gitter, Hipchat, etc. They describe how things like this that are useful but not essential are available as addins.
(46:28) Kevin asks if there are any addins that they see as missing. Gary says there aren’t at the moment. He’s got a generic build script for all of his addins, so adding to the script rolls out to all of his addins.
(48:08) Jon asks about the discussion in their repo: How do we prevent Addin’s becoming stale? Gary talks about the problem (a community member creates a useful addin, then stops maintaining the addin). Their plan is to set up a cake-contrib organization which can help with long-term ownership and support for community addins, allowing them to push NuGet updates as required if the original creator is no longer available or involved. The plan is to ask users to move their addins into the new cake-contrib organization and make the cake contrib user a co-maintainer. Note: Since this was recorded, they’ve set up this organization, as discussed in the wrap-up after the show.
Open Source Project Case Studies: NancyFx and IdentityServer
(53:14) Jon asks about some of the open source project build conversions to Cake, starting with NancyFx. Mattias explains some of the challenges, as well as the clear payoff: build script pull requests very soon after the conversion. Jon asks some nitpicky details about why the NancyFx build script script is spawning a process instead of using a Cake wrapper. Mattias explains the process by which build scripts are refined, and Gary points out the advantage of always being able to spawn a process if you need to do something Cake doesn’t yet support.
(57:43) Jon asks about the IdentityServer migration. Gary said the IdentityServer team had already done the .NET Core port running under PSake and just wanted to migrate to Cake to get cross-platform builds going. It’s also a lot simple of a build process because it’s doing less.
(58:50) Jon asks about ilmerge suport. Mattias says it’s pretty popular for tools, to allow you to distribute the tool as a single exe. Gary says he uses Fody Costura instead to handle assembly merging. Jon says he doesn’t think any assembly merging support is available yet for .NET Core. Gary agrees, and Mattias says that .NET Native support will be helpful when it arrives.
Future Plans and Getting In Touch
(1:00:08) Jon asks about future milestones and what’s on the horizon after the .NET Core release. Gary hints at some upcoming releases, which are covered in the post-show wrap-up.
(1:01:20) Gary talks about some upcoming speaking engagements, and Mattias mentions the Gitter chat, Twitter and GitHub issues as ways for users to ask any questions.
(1:03:10) Cake Contributions organization The Cake Contributions organization (cake-contrib on GitHub) is now in full motion. It’s a common place where people can put their Cake addins & modules, if they want. They still maintain and for all purposes “own” the code, but they get access to resources like CI services, common build scripts, better exposure and the Cake core team can assist with merging pull requests, fixing issues and pushing to NuGet if addin grows stale or the author just too busy with life in general. It’s been well received and quite a few projects has moved over.
(1:03:52) 0.16 Release with .NET Core support So in addition to full .net Framework support, Cake now supports .NET Core (netstandard 1.6). There have been a few patch releases following this, so as of Oct 11 they’re up to 0.16.2. Also, due to adding .NET Core support, it’s now possible to debug a Cake file with Visual Studio Code. That’s cool, because there’s now cross platform debugging support for Cake. There’s a blog post showing how to do that.
(1:04:25) Frosting Frosting is a stand-alone .NET Core runner and host for cake. Cake uses the Roslyn scripting API and provides a DSL for fetching dependencies like tools and addins. Frosting uses the .NET core SDK to handle dependencies, and your cake build script is really just a .NET Core console app. Both are running against the same Cake.Core and Cake.Common packages, they’re just being hosted differently. This gives you some advantages – you’ve got full Visual Studio IntelliSense and tooling support, use the standard methods to package your build as a NuGet package, etc. Frosting also includes a dotnet CLI tool, so you can call dotnet cake.
(1:05:46) Cake for Yeoman support This adds a cake generator which makes it easy to bootstrap Cake, including a build script, bootstrapper scripts and config files in the current directory just by typing yo cake. There’s also scaffolding support to create a new .NET Core project using Frosting with yeoman.
(1:06:18) Cake for Visual Studio This is the first release of the Cake for Visual Studio extension. It includes syntax highlighting, Task Runner Explorer integration, bootstrapper commands in the Build menu, project templates for Cake addins, Cake Addin unit test projects, and Cake Modules
(02:55) Jon asks Matt to overview React. Matt explains how React handles views, components, and unidirectional databinding. Matt says it’s nice that it moves us towards the component model in the HTML world – moving away from the jQuery direct DOM manipulation approach to a more holistic approach.
(05:40) Jon says that he thinks that components introduce some problems of their own and asks Matt how React avoids that complexity. Matt says that’s why Flux and Redux were introduced.
(06:35) Jon asks what React Native is. Eric explains that React Native allows you to take the same concepts and tool used for building React web applications and use them to build native applications. It started at Facebook and has picked up a lot open source momentum.
How React Native compares to Cordova, Xamarin, etc.
(07:33) Jon says there’s always heated discussion when you talk about building native applications using web technology. What’s the overhead? Is this similar to Cordova? Eric explains the differences.
(11:22) Jon asks where React Native fits in on the scale from Cordova to more native tools like Xamarin.
Technical Implementation: How React Native creates Windows UWP applications
(17:30) Jon asks about how elements are styled, since from his experience that’s all done using CSS styles. Eric says they use a subset of CSS called Flexbox using a library by a developer from Facebook. Matt says when they ported over the F8 app to Windows, they leveraged the same styles and platform specific style pattern that had been used for iOS and Android.
(19:23) Jon asks what was most difficult in moving the F8 application to Windows. Eric says the styling part was pretty easy. The hardest part was in handling platform specific support. Matt describes an issue with linear gradient support.
Nuts and bolts: Data, Extensibility, X-Plat Dev, Building and Publishing, Scaffolding, Tools, Testing, etc.
(21:55) Jon asks about any other platform specific issues. Eric says that it’s conceptually similar to Xamarin in that are you need to keep in mind that you’re writing to a native front end experience. He explains that it’s a happy medium between web front-end (Cordova) and native in that the simple UI components like text are easily shared, but you can target more platform specific controls as needed. He talks about some differences in things like menus, split views and carousels.
(23:50) Jon asks about the cross-platform development experience? Do you use a lot of emulators? Eric says he mostly works on Windows using the Visual Studio Android Emulator. He says when he’s adding a new feature to React Native for Windows, he’ll pop open the Android emulator and use the UI explorer. Matt says he also uses Android Studio and Xcode.
(25:44) Jon asks if there’s a long build step, or if there’s a quick feedback cycle. Eric says that React is built to make the developer experience really fast, and explains how hot module reloading makes it possible to see application code changes without reloading or even losing current running state. Matt says that you also get the full Chrome debugging experience.
(27:15) Jon asks how you package your application for publishing. Matt talks about the publishing steps.
(28:10) Jon asks about the rnpm (React Native Package Manager) command-line tool. Eric explains how rnpm helps you include dependencies in your React Native applications. It’s extensible, so Eric and Matt used that to implement the Windows scaffolding experience.
(29:52) Jon says that in the scaffolded application he got when he ran rnpm, there are OS specific files for each view and asks if it’s possible to use a consolidated view for all platforms when appropriate. Eric says you’ll generally need a platform-specific entry point for each OS, but once you get past that you can do quite a bit with the core React Native elements.
(31:15) Jon asks if it’s possible to create additional platform-specific controls. Matt talks about support for native modules (e.g. dialogs) and native components (e.g. ImageView).
(33:20) Jon asks how he actually runs the application as he’s developing it. Matt says they just read in from the command-line to start the packager and build and run the application using Visual Studio. The docs currently say Visual Studio is required, although that isn’t necessarily the case if you kick off your build using msbuild.
(34:30) Jon asks if it could be possible to create a React Native Windows application on Mac or Linux, or if you’ll always need Windows due to the SDK. Matt says you’ll always need the SDKs, but Eric points out that there is a web-based React Native Playground (rnplay.org), and they’d like to reach out to them to get Windows support added.
(35:33) Jon asks if anyone is using it beyond the F8 application. Matt says not yet, they’re still working on the dev experience before they start heavily onboarding people. Jon asks who’s using React Native in general and Matt points out the React Native Showcase.
(36:50) Since part of the idea of UWP is that it runs on multiple Windows platforms, Jon asks if they’ve done anything with that. Eric talks about how part of their F8 demonstration included showing the application on Xbox, mobile devices with Continuum and desktop. They’re interested in looking into HoloLens and IoT as well.
(38:00) Jon asks if it’d be possible to leverage React web code in a React Native application. Eric says that at F8 he saw a talk on the possibility of bringing React Native to web. There are definite sharing points in code between web applications and React Native apps, although you should expect to write native views, and points out that there is work going on to bring React Native to Tizen and macOS.
(39:35) Jon asks if React Native for Windows is a science project or an ongoing project. Eric and Matt say they’ll be watching for community interest. They expect to keep up with React Native releases, and are hoping for community contributions. Eric says there are hundreds of React Native community modules, and they can’t scale to supporting all of them without some community involvement.
(01:58) Jon notes that they’re using Windows and CentOS and asks why CentOS as opposed to other Linux flavors. Nick says they tried Ubuntu first, but it’s more tuned for clients. CentOS is a variant of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so all the packages work.
(02:53) Nick says that they use whatever’s the best tool for each job – factoring in the costs of each new tool (training, migrating, supporting, vendor overhead, etc.). They run Elastic Search, Redis, HAProxy and Logstash.
(03:50) Jon asks about how they’re using protobuf to serialize the information they’re persisting Redis. Nick talks about some specifics, including the different levels of caching that they’re doing. They’re using pub / sub with Redis via websockets. They’re not clustering, partly because there’s one Redis cache per SE site. He and Jon discuss how multitenant scenarios often require custom implementations.
(07:20) Jon asks about how they’re using websockets. Nick says that they’re used in a lot of places for optional updates. Their problems come from running on very few servers – they end up with huge connection tables per server.
(08:23) Jon asks about one of their Redis instances that’s handling machine learning with Providence. Nick says they log some metadata and performance information about about every single request. Providence is a system their data team wrote that analyzes the data, figures out locations, suggested user tags, etc. As a user, you have control over the personalization and can download the data or disable recommendations if you want. There’s also a mobile feed, for mobile apps as well. There are 40k ops/sec all day long against Redis. Scott K asks if he can manipulate his feed.
(11:51) Scott K asks about the L1 and L2 cache that Nick’s talked about. Nick clarifies that he’s been referring to HTTP caching on the web server and Redis caching.
(19:48) Jon asks about the Elastic Search implementation. Elastic Search doesn’t really support types, it has field groupings, which makes the upgrade more difficult. Nick explains that things are pretty vanilla now, but they’d like to make some customizations to support nested search results when time permits.
Data and SQL Server
(21:03) Jon asks about their SQL Server implementation. Nick talks about the clustering setup.
(21:49) Jon asks what version of SQL Server they’re using. Nick says they’re currently running the latest version of SQL Server 2014 and will move to SQL Server 2016 as soon as it releases. [Note: SQL Server 2016 has since released and they’ve upgraded.]
(22:11) Nick talks about some of the top reasons they’re looking forward to SQL Server 2016: string_split and JSON parsing. These are both useful for queries that take a list as a parameter. Jon reminisces about a time long ago when he used XML to pass lists to SQL queries.
(23:32) Kevin asks if they’re able to do a piecemeal migration without downtime. Nick explains how they do upgrades using replicas. They can test on other replicas, then fail over to them, or roll back to the previous master. They hate Windows clustering, and Windows Server 2016 and SQL Server 2016 should soon support distributed affinity groups which would allow them to do simple affinity group based upgrades.
(26:15) Jon asks about SQL Server on Linux. Nick says he can’t really talk about it.
(26:35) Jon asks if they use SQL Server Hekaton / In-Memory OLTP. Nick says they don’t, they run enough memory in their database servers that it’s not needed. Nick says it’s more for high-frequency no-lock access.
(29:27) Jon asks about how they handle migrations. Nick explains how changing tables is handled via a migration file and a ten line bot.
Source Control, Localization, Build
(30:47) Jon asks about their use of GitLab. Nick says it works okay, but they’re testing GitHub Enterprise internally due to performance. GitHub is significantly faster, search works a lot better (due to using Postgres search rather than Elastic Search), and there are some nice new features in GitHub like squashing commits.
(32:23) Jon asks about the localization features and is educated about the ja, ru, pt and es versions of stackoverflow. Nick explains some of the different localization issues that you run into in localization. Most localization solution work by string replacement, which requires string allocations. That doesn’t work at scale. They’ve written a system called Moonspeak which uses Roslyn to precompile view. This allows a direct response.write of the localized string via switch statements, which is a lot more efficient. They haven’t had time to open source it yet, but would like to.
(36:36) Jon asks about their build process using MSBuild. They use it mostly because it’s what the tooling uses. They could customize it more with PowerShell, but that would tie them more to TeamCity and Nick’s not sure there’s a benefit to making that move. Nick’s waiting to see where csproj is going – he’s got some big doubts it’ll be as terse as project.json, but he’s interested to see. Nick says historically MSBuild has been optimized for three-way merge generation; Jon says that was technically Visual Studio’s fault since MSBuild actually has had glob support for a while.
Upcoming Technologies, Visual Studio
(40:35) Nick complains about how slow Visual Studio is to reload projects. Their developers have scripts that just kill and restart Visual Studio, because that’s faster than handling project reloads.
(41:16) Jon asks if Nick’s played with Visual Studio “15”. Nick wonders about the technology used in the installer. He says it’s generally good, but they’re running into some issues with solution files changing when moving between versions.
(42:33) Nick says that they generally don’t ever use File / New, they copy an existing project and rename things. There’s a discussion about whether it’s possible to customize project templates. Jon says you can export a project as a solution template; K Scott mentions that SideWaffle has some capabilities there, too, but there was some “wonkiness”. And what’s the deal with GUIDs in project and solution files?
(46:09) Scott K mentions a command line base project generator that he started on years ago called ProjectStarter. He wishes that it was possible to configure Visual Studio to define a custom build tool rather than assuming everything’s in csproj. He gets that Visual Studio features like IntelliSense depend on controlling the build, but doesn’t like that Visual Studio has to “know everything about everything”.
(48:55) Jon says he sees two ways that cross-platform can work: either make the frameworks able to work without the tools knowing and controlling everything, or updating Visual Studio Code so it’s able to know and control everything. He hopes it’s the first way.
(49:50) Nick complains about how sometimes in-memory builds don’t reflect changes, or csproj doesn’t save before a build. He’d like everything to save before builds. Scott K calls out the Save All The Time extension for Visual Studio that Paul Betts made.
(50:40) Jon asks Nick if they’ve looked at ASP.NET Core. Nick says that they’ll mostly be starting with their internal tools. They have several libs that they’ll need to port, and they’ve got some difficult problems with libraries like MiniProfiler that need to support both .NET 4.x and .NET Core because the underlying APIs have some significant differences. You can’t just multi-target code that targets things like HttpContext. Other libraries like dapper and stackexchange-redis haven’t been as bad, and they’ve been working on them because lots of other developers are depending on them.
(55:03) Jon calls out some of Nick’s recent C# 6 tweets. Nick says he likes null coalescing and ternaries – they see more terse code as a lot more readable, but it of course varies by team. Roslyn has been really big for them, things like Moonspeak rely on it.
Questions from Twitter
(56:23) Matt Warren asks “What performance issues have you had the most fun finding and fixing.” Nick mentions the tag engine and a fun debugging issue they ran into where the TimeSpan int constructor uses Ticks rather than seconds or milliseconds, so their cache code was only caching values for tiny fractions of a second rather than thirty seconds. They find out so many issues using MiniProfiler; he wishes more developers would use MiniProfiler (or another tool like Glimpse) in their applications. They run MiniProfiler for every single request on StackOverflow and the overhead is minimal – if they can do it, you can do it.
(58:17) Matt Warren asks “What the craziest thing they’ve done to increase performance.” Nick talks about the IL related work they’ve done – sometimes instead of conditional code, it’s faster to just swap out the method body. They’re pragmatic, they only do this for extreme cases like things that run for every request and have real performance implications. What’s the trick for StackOverflow? Keep it simple.